Charter schools: A lifeline for special needs students
With the support she received at a hybrid charter school, the author’s daughter thrived in high school and has just completed her first semester of college with a 4.0 GPA.
Photo courtesy of Tab Berg
Legislators need to consult parents when making decisions that impact current charter school reform negotiations. Too often in California’s education policymaking process, choices with profound consequences for students and families are shaped behind closed doors, driven by institutional interests, while parents are asked to weigh in only after the framework has already been set. As the Legislature reconvenes in January, California has a critical opportunity to course-correct by recognizing parents not as a procedural checkbox, but as essential partners in shaping education policy.
Charter schools are not a niche experiment. They serve more than 12% of California’s public school students, and their diverse models reflect the students they serve. Classroom-based charters support advanced learners seeking accelerated, innovative coursework, or flexibility to pursue athletics or vocational pathways. Virtual and independent study programs are lifelines for students with chronic health conditions, behavioral challenges, disabilities, or who have previously dropped out of school. School-at-home models serve families whose children need stability, flexibility, or a calmer environment to succeed.
For our family, this was not a philosophical debate — it was a lived experience. One of my daughters was intubated at birth for an extended period, resulting in problems related to damaged vocal cords. She also has mild cerebral palsy and autism. She is exceptionally bright, yet the traditional school system was unable to accommodate her unique needs.
Rather than identifying a path to success, education officials placed her on a “certificate track,” meaning she would meet attendance requirements but not graduate with a diploma. That decision effectively closed the door to college and most professional careers before she had the chance to show her potential.
For students like my daughter, charters are not about ideology. They are about access, hope and a chance to build a productive life.
Tab Berg
We eventually found a hybrid charter school that offered what the system could not: a thoughtful blend of therapy, individualized instruction, virtual mainstream coursework, and real-world internships. Earlier this year, she graduated from high school with a 3.25 GPA and 10 AP and dual-enrollment credits. She is now completing her first semester of college with a 4.0 GPA, studying childhood development and hoping to become a therapist for children with special needs.
She is building a future defined by purpose, independence, and service — none of which would have been possible without the commitment of her charter school administrators, teachers and therapists. Her life, her future and the futures of students like her are worth fighting for.
For students like my daughter, charters are not about ideology. They are about access, hope and a chance to build a productive life. They are about finding a setting where a child can thrive academically, socially and emotionally when the rigid traditional system has fallen short. Yet, as the latest reports make clear, current reform negotiations focus largely on governance structures and political compromises, with little attention to how proposed changes will affect the very students these schools serve.
That disconnect is why we created the Parents Matter Campaign.
Our grassroots campaign amplifies the voices of California families in the legislative arena, ensuring parents play a central role in education policy discussions. Parents bring essential perspectives that are often missing when policy is shaped exclusively by institutional interests. Our advocacy reflects a simple reality: policy outcomes are shaped long before a bill is voted on, driven by who engages early and is politically active in Sacramento.
The Parents Matter Campaign is already underway, engaging key lawmakers through legislative briefings that elevate real student and family experiences. These conversations demonstrate that parents are credible, informed voices in the broader 2026 education debate. When legislators address accountability, equity or oversight, parents are prepared to explain how flexibility and choice improve outcomes for their children — not just in theory, but in daily learning.
We are also leveraging our network platforms to keep parent stories visible in the media. Too often, education coverage defaults to special interest spokespeople. The Parents Matter Campaign aims to change that by showing that parents are organized, knowledgeable and indispensable partners in policymaking.
As charter reform negotiations continue, legislators face a choice: They can continue to broker compromises among institutions, or they can invite parents in as indispensable partners. If legislators are serious about improving education outcomes, the answer should be obvious.
Parents matter, and it’s time that California’s policy process reflects that truth.
•••
Tab Berg is the president of California Parents for Public Virtual Education. He lives in Fair Oaks with his wife and two daughters.
The opinions expressed in this commentary represent those of the author. EdSource welcomes commentaries representing diverse points of view. If you would like to submit a commentary, please review our guidelines and contact us.
